Issue #1(11) 2017 Astronautics

Spaceplane rationale - a new way of thinking

Early US Space Shuttle designs were fully reusable but after budget cuts NASA had to choose between full reusability or a smaller true spaceplane.
Early US Space Shuttle designs were fully reusable but after budget cuts NASA had to choose between full reusability or a smaller true spaceplane.
David Ashford Managing Director, Bristol Spaceplanes, United Kingdom

The very high cost of sending people and payloads into space has hardly changed in real terms over the 55 years of human spaceflight - largely due to the use of launchers that are based on ballistic missile technology and that can therefore be used only once. But back in the 1960s many aircraft companies had feasible, if challenging, designs for fully orbital spaceplanes which were never realised. What would then have been very difficult is now more easily achievable and, if consensus can be reached on how best to go about building an airliner that can fly into space, it might usher in a new affordable space age within as little as 15 years.

All orbital space launchers in service today can fly only once and this expendability is the root cause of the high cost and economic risk of spaceflight. It is unimaginable that we would scrap a car after only a few hours on the road – the average per day cost of owning and driving it would shoot up to around a thousand times more than it actually is. Much the same applies to aviation. If aeroplanes could fly only once before being taken out of service, the cost of a flight across the Atlantic would be roughly one thousand times more than it is. And likewise, reusable launchers could reduce the cost of spaceflight by about one thousand times, given high enough traffic levels for economies of scale.

Just as steam locomotives transformed land transport, so spaceplanes will transform spaceflight and thereby make a huge contribution to life on our planet. Imagine a new space age in which a fleet of 50-seat aeroplanes that can fly to space and offer routine and affordable transport to and from orbit. These spaceplanes look similar to the Anglo-French supersonic Concorde, taking off from and landing on conventional runways.

In this scenario the cost per seat to orbit is about one thousand times less than it is today (a few tens of thousands of dollars compared with a few tens of millions) so that middle-income people prepared to save can even afford to visit space hotels in orbit round Earth. Cargo versions would launch satellites and space platforms at greatly reduced costs.

Find out more about the future of spaceplanes in the full version of this article, available now to our subscribers.

To continue reading this premium article, subscribe now for unlimited access to all online content

If you already have a login and password to access - Please log in to be able to read all the articles of the site.

Popular articles

See also

Space Environment

Space, secular stagnation, and the economic crisis


A new microgravity research facility for Central Texas and beyond

Space Environment

Resource Prospector – a Lunar Pathfinder

Popular articles

James Vaughan Astronautics

Creating a viable cislunar economy

SLS Block 1, the initial configuration of NASA’s new super heavy lift launch vehicle, will be able to lift at least 70 metric tons to low Earth orbit and is the cornerstone of a new deep space exploration system. Special Reports

SLS ushers transformation of deep space exploration

Diffuse, water-ice clouds, a hazy sky and a light breeze. Such might have read a weather forecast for the Tharsis volcanic region on Mars on 22 November 2016, when this image was taken by the ExoMars Trace Gas Orbiter. Space Science

When it comes to water Mars may not be the promised land